
%\VignetteIndexEntry{SLGI Vignette}
%\VignetteDepends{}
%\VignetteKeywords{genetic interaction}
%\VignettePackage{SLGI}
\documentclass[letter,12pt]{article}

\usepackage{amsmath,fullpage}
\usepackage{hyperref} 
\usepackage{xr-hyper}
\usepackage[authoryear,round]{natbib}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{subfigure}

\newcommand{\Rfunction}[1]{{\texttt{#1}}}
\newcommand{\Robject}[1]{{\texttt{#1}}}
\newcommand{\Rpackage}[1]{{\textsf{#1}}}
\newcommand{\Rclass}[1]{{\textit{#1}}}
\newcommand{\Special}[1]{{\texttt{#1}}}

\title{Synthetic Genetic Interaction in Yeast genes}
\author{N. LeMeur and Z. Jiang}

\begin{document}

\maketitle
\section{Introduction}
Synthetic genetic interactions experiments are now being conduct to
better understand cellular interactions. The generated data have
already proven to be extremely valuable \citep{Davierwala2005,
  Tong2004, Zhao2005}.  Synthetic lethality especially defines a
genetic interaction were the combination of mutations in two or more
genes leads to cell death.  The implications of synthetic lethal
screens have been discussed in the context of drug development as
synthetic lethal pairs could be used to selectively kill cancer cells,
but leave normal cells relatively unharmed.

In this package, we propose statistical and computational tools for a
systems biology approach in analyzing synthetic genetic
interactions. Currently, our methods can be used to find
relationships between synthetic genetic interactions and cellular
organizational units such multi-protein complexes or sequence motifs.

\section{Synthetic genetic interaction data}
Several synthetic genetic datasets are now publicly available. In this
package we currently propose 6 datasets:
\begin{itemize}
\item \cite{Tong2004} Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion
\item \cite{Pan2006}  DNA integrity experiment in \textit{S. cerevisiae}
\item \cite{measday2005sys} Systematic yeast synthetic lethal and
  synthetic dosage lethal screens identify genes required for
  chromosome segregation.
\item \cite{schuldiner2005efa} Genetic Interaction Data (EMAP) from
  the yeast early secretory pathway
\item \cite{Collins2007} Functional dissection of protein complexes
  involved in yeast chromosome biology using a genetic interaction
  map.
\item \cite{Chervitz} Synthetic genetic interaction data from as recorded by the
Saccharomyces Genome database in January, 2007.
\end{itemize} 

In this package and as reported by most authors, we use the terms
\textit{query genes} for the genes that are specifically tested by the
experimenter and \textit{array genes} for the target genes usually
spotted on a array (\textit{e.g.,} SGA, dSLAM). We note however that
an analogy can be made with the concept of \textit{bait} and
\textit{prey} terms used in proteomic experiments (\textit{e.g.,} Y2H,
APMS).

\subsection{Synthetic genetic array data, Tong et al. (2004)}
\cite{Tong2001} used the \textit{Synthetic Genetic Array technology}
or SGA to investigate synthetic genetic interaction in
\textit{S. cerevisiae}. The package \Rpackage{SLGI} contains both the
raw and preprocessed data from \cite{Tong2004}. To access those data
you first need to load the package \Rpackage{SLGI} and the yeast
genome annotation package (\Rpackage{org.Sc.sgd.db}):

<<set up,results=hide>>=
library("SLGI")
library("org.Sc.sgd.db")

##loading Tong et al data
data(SGA)
data(Atong)
@ 

Data \Robject{SGA} contains the systematic names of all the
\Sexpr{length(SGA)} genes tested by \cite{Tong2004}, including both
the ones that were reported as presenting synthetic genetic
interactions and the ones that were not (\Robject{SGAraw} corresponds
to the original list parsed from table1 of \cite{Tong2001}
supplementary material).

We can verify that the genes reported by \cite{Tong2004} are well
characterized. To that aim, we use the yeast annotation data package
\Rpackage{org.Sc.sgd.db}:

<<rejected>>=
rejected <- length(intersect(SGA, org.Sc.sgdREJECTORF))
@ 

We note that at this time \Sexpr{rejected} genes (out of the
\Sexpr{length(SGA)}) are among the rejected ORF listed by the
\textit{Saccharomyces} Genome Database (SGD
\href{http://www.yeastgenome.org/}{http://www.yeastgenome.org/}).  If
one want to update common gene names or alias to systematic names, one
can use the following:

<<aliasMatch>>=
updateSGA=mget(SGA, org.Sc.sgdCOMMON2ORF, ifnotfound = NA )
@ 

The \Robject{tong2004raw} data.frame contains the original data
reported by \cite{Tong2004} as Table S1 in their online supporting
material. The \Robject{Atong} data contains the association matrix
extracted from the \Robject{tong2004raw} data.frame.  The gene names
were updated for systematic gene names.  They selected
\Sexpr{dim(Atong)[[1]]} query genes that are known involved in a
chosen set of molecular functions.

<<essential genes in query gene list, echo=FALSE, results=hide>>=
data(essglist)
esg = names(essglist)
n1 <- sum( esg %in% dimnames(Atong)[[1]])
n2 <- sum( esg %in% dimnames(Atong)[[2]])
@ 

There are \Sexpr{n1} essential genes found in the query genes.
\cite{Tong2004} pointed out that some of the query genes are partially
functioning alleles of essential genes.  So, we assumed these genes
are fine.  There are also \Sexpr{n2} essential genes in the reported
array genes that showed synthetic lethal (SL) interaction with at
least one of the query genes.  We checked these three genes.  Two of
them, "YJL174W" and "YPL075W" , are annotated both "lethal" and
"viable" in the \Special{SGD} database.  The other gene, "YBR121C", is
"lethal".  We don't have the resources to tract down why this gene
appears on the \Special{SGA} array \cite{Tong2001}.

\subsubsection{Synthetic lethal and synthetic dosage lethal screens, Measday et al (2005)}

\cite{measday2005sys} perform some systematic yeast synthetic lethal
and synthetic dosage lethal screens using the SGA approach
\citep{Tong2001}.  They first tested 14 query genes and found 84
non-essential genes that synthetically interact with at least one
query gene (\Robject{SLchr}).  Then they tested interaction between 3
query genes and the genome wide set of deletion strains under 3
different temperatures. They found 141 array genes that interact at
least with one query gene (\Robject{SDL}). They identified genes
required for chromosome segregation.

\subsection{DNA integrity experiment in S. cerevisiae, Pan et al (2006)}
The package contains raw and preprocessed data from \cite{Pan2006}
obtained in Boeke's lab.
<<>>=
data(Boeke2006raw)
data(Boeke2006)
@ 

\Robject{Boeke2006raw} is a data frame with 5775 observations and
\Robject{Boeke2006} is an incidence matrix reporting the systematic
genetic interactions identified between 74 query genes and the
deletion gene set in \cite{Pan2004} (see man pages for more details).

The technology used by Boeke and collaborators is slightly different
from the approach taken by \cite{Tong2001}. The used heterozygote
diploid-based synthetic lethality analyzed by microarray (dSLAM). The
21991 probes spotted on the dSLAM array are available by calling
\Robject{dSLAM.GPL1444} or \Robject{dSLAM} (see man pages for more
details).

\subsection{Genetic Interaction Data (EMAP), Schuldiner et al (2005) and Collins (2007)}
We also collected data generated by Collins and
collaborators. These data are different from the other as they have be
heavily preprocessed using their own procedure, EMAP or epistatic
miniarray profiles. Those data are presented as incidence matrix and
are accompanied by some metadata, e.g., systematic names and mutated
allele. 

<<>>=
## Schuldiner et al. (2005)
data(gi2005)
data(gi2005.metadata)
@ 

\subsection{Saccharomyces Genome database}
We provide synthetic genetic interaction data as recorded by the
Saccharomyces Genome database in January, 2007. Data can be accessed
using \Robject{SGD.SL}, synthetic lethal, \Robject{SGD.SynRescue},
synthetic rescue, and \Robject{SGD.SynGrowthDefect}, synthetic growth
defect.

\section{Transcription Factor data}
The transcription factor binding affinities data were extracted from
\cite{Lee2002}. They represented as an matrix where rows are
\textit{S. cerevisiae} systematic gene names and columns known transcription
factor.  The value in each entry represents the p-value, as reported
by \cite{Lee2002}, for the transcription factor (TF) binding upstream
of the gene.

<<>>=
data(TFmat)
@ 

\section{Example of analysis: Synthetic genetic interactions and multi-protein complexes}
To integrate synthetic genetic interactions with multi-protein
complexes, we can make use of the interactome as defined in the
\Rpackage{ScISI} package. The \Rpackage{ScISI} package or \textit{In
  Silico Interactome for Saccharomyces cerevisiae} provides an
interactome built for computational experimentation.  The
\Robject{ScISI} is binary incidence matrix where the rows are indexed
by the gene locus names and the columns are indexed by the
identification codes for the protein complexes based on the repository
from where they are obtained. This interactome is currently built from
the Intact, Gene Ontology and Mips curated databases, and estimated
protein complexes from the \Rpackage{apComplex} package. In this
vignette, we will make use of a subset of the \Robject{ScISI}
interactome, the \Robject{ScISIC} data, that only contains the data
from the curated databases.

<<ScISI>>=
library(ScISI)
data(ScISIC)
ScISIC[1:5, 1:5]
@ 

As an example we will use the data generated by \cite{Pan2006}.First,
one need to reduce the interactome matrix and genetic interaction
matrix to the same list of genes. This can be done using the
\Rfunction{gi2Interactome} function.
<<>>=
data(Boeke2006)
data(dSLAM)

dim(Boeke2006)
Boeke2006red <- gi2Interactome(Boeke2006, ScISIC)
dim(Boeke2006red)
@ 

Next we can identify multi-protein complexes that present synthetic
interaction among their proteins (\bf{within} interaction) or share
synthetic interaction with other multi-protein complex (\bf{between}
interaction) using the \Rfunction{getInteraction} function. This
function requires the incidence matrix, the array list and the
interactome of interest.

<<>>=
interact <- getInteraction(Boeke2006red, dSLAM, ScISIC)
@ 

Then, one might want to know how what are the multi-protein complexes that
share at least \textit{n} interactions:
<<>>=
intSummary <- iSummary(interact$bwMat, n=5)
@ 

Finally, we want to know if any of those interactions are
statistically significant. To that aim we developed 2
approaches. First, using a graph theory approach, we test whether those
interactions are randomly distributed within the interactome.

<<eval=FALSE>>=
modelBoeke <- modelSLGI(Boeke2006red, 
          universe= dSLAM, interactome=ScISIC,type="intM", perm=5)
@ 

A \Rfunction{plot} function allows you the visualize the result. In
this case, we note that the number of observed synthetic genetic
interaction is globally higher that the simulated data

<<eval=FALSE>>=
plot(modelBoeke,pch=20)
@ 
<<echo=FALSE,fig=TRUE>>
print(plot(modelBoeke,pch=20))
@ 

Note that here, for computer time efficiency, we only performed 5
permutations but for really analysis 100 permutations or more are
strongly recommended.

Next, we can perform a Hypergeometric test to identify the
multi-protein complexes that presents a unusual number of synthetic
genetic interaction. 

The \Rfunction{test2Interact} function allows you
to summarize the genetic interactions within one cellular
organizational unit or between 2 cellular organizational units, taking
into account all the interactions tested (positive or negative).
One can compute the global interaction matrix as follows:

<<eval=FALSE>>=
array <- dSLAM[dSLAM %in% rownames(ScISIC)]
query <- rownames(Boeke2006)[rownames(Boeke2006) %in% rownames(ScISIC)]
allInteract <- matrix(1, nrow=length(query), ncol=length(array),
               dimnames=list(query, array))
tested <- getInteraction(allInteract, dSLAM, ScISIC)
@ 

<<eval=FALSE>>=
testedInteract <- test2Interact(iMat=interact$bwMat, tMat=tested$bwMat, interactome=ScISIC)
significant <- hyperG(cbind("Tested"=testedInteract$tested,"Interact"=testedInteract$interact), 
              sum(Boeke),  nrow(Boeke2006red)*length(dSLAM)) 
@ 


\bibliographystyle{plainnat}
\bibliography{SLGI}

\end{document}
